Monday, September 30, 2013
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Parasites Rule the ecosystem
Parasites Rule the ecosystem because they control the financial system. It’s done by:
Controlling the structure of revenue flows
Controlling the institutions
Controlling the situational
Parasites are organized by neoliberal economists because they also are parasites. Parasites are in charge of every aspect of the world economic system, by the simple act of controlling revenue flows.
Revenue flows control everything and everything depends on them.
Parasites need to be replaced by the free and living who reject the principle that parasites whom live off the free and living should continue to control all revenue flows.
Controlling the structure of revenue flows
Controlling the institutions
Controlling the situational
Parasites are organized by neoliberal economists because they also are parasites. Parasites are in charge of every aspect of the world economic system, by the simple act of controlling revenue flows.
Revenue flows control everything and everything depends on them.
Parasites need to be replaced by the free and living who reject the principle that parasites whom live off the free and living should continue to control all revenue flows.
Monday, August 19, 2013
Economic change
Change to what?
It’s so obvious that the total history of economic disasters center on the behavior of corporate economics. It really doesn’t matter if it’s a capitalist or socialist, or communist based economy.
The decisions on how these various corporations are run is not a democratic process. Because of that the rights of everyone and everything are not taken into consideration and because of that - mass pollution, extinction and the whole genocide of various ecosystems are either being exploited or destroyed by this process.
The system has to change, but change to what?
The first thing it has to be - is inclusive. The second thing - is all entities have to be represented in the decision-making process. The third - constant assessment of the effect of decisions made by the board on the human and ecological commons.
The concept is based on fairness and that fairness has to be inclusive. Minorities have to be included as majorities are. Representational decision-making must take place in all corporate decisions that include representatives of the effected systems.
There are presidents for this that show it can be done.
A parliamentary board system be established for every incorporated business and those elected would have standing as shareholders with the same voting rights as the investment shareholders.
Ecosystem shareholders, humanity shareholders, worker shareholders will be included in the composition of the board of directors. All decisions by the board will then be assessed by and voted upon by all standing shareholders before any action will take place.
An assessment process of the corporate decisions will take place quarterly and a yearly assessment will combine earnings and profits accounting with the ecological and humanity implications will be included in the earnings accounting.
If those assessment show that the strategies that were implemented by the board were proved to be detrimental to humanity and the ecosystem, readies would be implemented to address and fix the decision making process that made the detrimental effects.
This process would be called the commons economy and would apply to all economic decision making at every level of the economic process.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
We need to redesign the machine
State control of massive corporations, note China, doesn’t work for
the eco-system, nor does local democratic processes, also note China.
No business practice that is generated by the state or ‘private sector’ is going to do the right thing when it comes to the ecosystem.
The reason? Any present form of accounting using any system, just won’t hack it.
Machines once set in place run the same way for ever. The reason – because they are machines. You can look at any government run economic system or corporate run economic system, simple as a machine.
The present system, socialist, communist, capitalist, all are basically machines. Running the machines either to make profits or not, end up in the same place. It’s not about who runs the levers and pushes the buttons, it’s about how the machine is constructed.
We need to redesign the machine, but in a clandestine way, I would submit.
The whole conceptual thought is simply that.
Externality inclusion in how the machine is designed is the most pragmatic approach that I can think off to at least start the redesign process.
The Planet Is Broke
No business practice that is generated by the state or ‘private sector’ is going to do the right thing when it comes to the ecosystem.
The reason? Any present form of accounting using any system, just won’t hack it.
Machines once set in place run the same way for ever. The reason – because they are machines. You can look at any government run economic system or corporate run economic system, simple as a machine.
The present system, socialist, communist, capitalist, all are basically machines. Running the machines either to make profits or not, end up in the same place. It’s not about who runs the levers and pushes the buttons, it’s about how the machine is constructed.
We need to redesign the machine, but in a clandestine way, I would submit.
The whole conceptual thought is simply that.
Externality inclusion in how the machine is designed is the most pragmatic approach that I can think off to at least start the redesign process.
The Planet Is Broke
Friday, July 12, 2013
Chimera a myth or not
lion goat serpent combined a myth that is fast becoming a reality but in a different way due to science its how you see the future its how we create the new myths of today what ideas we pass on to the future its all about what was passed on to us from the past
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Should U.S. corporations disclose their externalities in their 10K reports?
Should U.S. corporations disclose their externalities in their 10K reports?
Of course they should.
Should Federal Government contracts with corporations include discloser of the externalities created by the contract requests?
Of course they should.
Should the insurance industry promote the recognition of externalities in the contracts they sign with various sectors of the economy they insure?
Of course they should.
As the magnitude of risk increases with the advent of climate change, let alone all the issues regarding water concerns, the repercussions on the climate and water alone are creating massive costs to the insurance industry. The problem the insurance industry has, is they don’t know how and why it is happening and can't put a number on it because they don’t have the information they need to assess the insurance risks. Or do they?
It’s time to start doing something about externalities.
The insurance industry is on the front lines of the negative effects of climate change, yet is given little or no options to confront these negative externalities that create the problems.
It’s time to start doing something about it.
The Security and Exchange Commission should include in corporate reporting, that corporation include their externalities in their reports to the SEC.
The Federal Government should include in their contracts that all externalities be included in the cost estimates in the contracts they let out for bid.
The insurance industry would then have a better understanding of the risks that they are insuring against.
Shouldn't the insurance industry be made aware of externality risks by corporate and government reporting and would then have a better understanding of the total risks involved?
Of course they should.
Of course they should.
Should Federal Government contracts with corporations include discloser of the externalities created by the contract requests?
Of course they should.
Should the insurance industry promote the recognition of externalities in the contracts they sign with various sectors of the economy they insure?
Of course they should.
As the magnitude of risk increases with the advent of climate change, let alone all the issues regarding water concerns, the repercussions on the climate and water alone are creating massive costs to the insurance industry. The problem the insurance industry has, is they don’t know how and why it is happening and can't put a number on it because they don’t have the information they need to assess the insurance risks. Or do they?
It’s time to start doing something about externalities.
The insurance industry is on the front lines of the negative effects of climate change, yet is given little or no options to confront these negative externalities that create the problems.
It’s time to start doing something about it.
The Security and Exchange Commission should include in corporate reporting, that corporation include their externalities in their reports to the SEC.
The Federal Government should include in their contracts that all externalities be included in the cost estimates in the contracts they let out for bid.
The insurance industry would then have a better understanding of the risks that they are insuring against.
Shouldn't the insurance industry be made aware of externality risks by corporate and government reporting and would then have a better understanding of the total risks involved?
Of course they should.
Friday, June 21, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)